What Trump’s second term could mean for animal welfare

President-elect Donald Trump’s second term could bring sweeping changes to policies affecting wild, farmed, captive and research animals, with deregulation and industry-friendly practices likely to dominate.

Emily Anthes and Catrin Einhorn report for The New York Times.

In short:

Deregulation may harm wildlife by expanding energy development on public lands, reversing protections for vulnerable species and limiting climate change initiatives.
Farm animal welfare could see weaker oversight, with policies favoring increased production and slaughter speeds despite safety and humane concerns.
Reduced funding and enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act may weaken protections for research and captive animals, while policies on lab testing could reduce animal use but risk public health.

Key quote:

“I expect the second Trump term to be harmful to animals in many ways.”

— Ann Linder, associate director at Harvard University’s animal law and policy program.

Why this matters:

Policy shifts on climate change, land use and regulation under Trump could significantly harm biodiversity and animal welfare. Wild species and farmed animals face increased risks, while lax oversight may undermine protections for captive and research animals, exacerbating ethical and ecological issues.

www.nytimes.com

What Trump’s second term could mean for animal welfare

Western drought threatens water supply, boosts wildfire risk

‘Easter eggflation’: How climate change and budget cuts have sent the price of chocolate soaring

Opinion: As the oil majors retreat on climate promises, industry insiders ask whether to stay or go

In record heat, US ski resorts bulldoze snow, skiers wear bikinis

How a tiny farm county fought a data center complex and won

Clean energy companies are trying to survive the Trump era

To keep climate science alive, researchers are speaking in code

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.