Utah introduces new regulations for mineral extraction at the Great Salt Lake

A recent bill passed by the Utah Legislature introduces significant changes to the regulation of mineral extraction at the Great Salt Lake, aiming to address the lake's declining water levels.

Brooke Larsen reports for High Country News.

In short:

The bill, known as HB 453, introduces more stringent water use regulations to protect the Great Salt Lake from further decline.
It increases the severance tax on mineral extraction and requires companies to report water usage and salinity levels.
Despite some environmental groups' concerns, the legislation is seen as a crucial step towards sustainable management of the lake's resources.

Key quote:

“This is a good step forward, a necessary step forward, but we can’t let it distract us from the fact that they (state leaders) are not getting water to the lake, and this bill does not get water to the lake.”

— Chandler Rosenberg, deputy director of the Great Basin Water Network

Why this matters:

Advocates tout this as a potential shift in Utah's traditionally industry-friendly stance towards resource allocation and extractive development in the Great Salt Lake Basin. Critics contend that the legislation gives regulatory certainty to industry and does nothing to solve the ongoing western water crisis.

www.ehn.org

Utah introduces new regulations for mineral extraction at the Great Salt Lake

The psychological distance between us and climate disaster

Civil rights case probes racism behind Cancer Alley pollution

Insurance has become the real disaster for Black families

Why the Clean Air Act was never a ‘good fit’ for climate

Iran shocks could spur a shift to clean energy — but also to coal

Iran war: How green energy shields countries from oil shocks

Spain’s wind-farm bargain

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.