Trump enlisted Musk to trim the federal budget. Will this include cuts to fossil fuel subsidies?

President-elect Donald Trump’s plan to cut $2 trillion in federal spending may unexpectedly threaten fossil fuel subsidies, a potential boon for environmental advocates.

Tik Root reports for Grist.

In short:

Trump appointed Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, tasked with cutting federal spending by one-third and shrinking the workforce by 75%.
The U.S. provides fossil fuel subsidies ranging from $18 billion to $757 billion annually, depending on calculations, which could be targeted amid budget cuts.
Environmental experts argue that the largest subsidy is the industry's ability to pollute without full accountability, which DOGE may not address.

Key quote:

“The biggest subsidy is allowing these companies to freeload off our health.”

— Mark Jacobson, Stanford University professor of civil and environmental engineering

Why this matters:

Reducing fossil fuel subsidies could redirect billions to climate initiatives and reduce industry influence, but entrenched interests may resist reforms. The outcome could signal the direction of environmental policy under Trump’s leadership.

grist.org

Trump enlisted Musk to trim the federal budget. Will this include cuts to fossil fuel subsidies?

Chilean mackerel now sourced for popular Patagonia tinned fish

Business class flights are major polluters. Is cutting them the key to decarbonising air travel?

Opinion: How Europe’s climate and sustainability rules were shredded while citizens remained in the dark

Scientists fed biochar to cows. Here’s what happened

Republicans celebrate as lesser prairie chicken loses threatened, endangered status

The real economic impact of clean energy

Study: 2025 emissions rise due to Trump-era policies

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.