Three companies set new goals to address their environmental impact

Three global firms, GSK, Holcim, and Kering, are the first to adopt science-based targets for nature, aiming to curb water use and protect biodiversity.

Oliver Balch reports for Ethical Corporation Magazine, a part of Thomson Reuters.

In short:

GSK is partnering on water stewardship projects in India and plans to reduce water use by 20% by 2030.
Holcim targets a 39% reduction in freshwater withdrawals in Mexico and is addressing supplier traceability challenges.
Kering will cut water use by 21% and its land footprint by 3% by 2030, focusing on Tuscany’s leather tanning region.

Key quote:

“We need the comparability and measurability (of more brands joining the fray) in order to know that companies are doing enough to fulfil their part.”

— Erin Billman, executive director of Science Based Targets Network

Why this matters:

Corporate commitments to science-based targets for nature help companies learn about how to reduce their environmental footprint and thereby tackle biodiversity loss and water stress. Addressing these issues helps ensure sustainable supply chains and mitigate future environmental crises, but many companies remain reticent about participating.

Relevant EHN coverage: LISTEN: Revisiting our conversation with Jennifer Roberts discussing nature as medicine

www.reuters.com

Three companies set new goals to address their environmental impact

Chemical giant, climate skeptics vie for seats on EPA science panel

Nutritionist Marion Nestle weighs in on 'What to Eat Now'

With Trump absent from COP30 talks, the world moves on without U.S.

Podcast: Will we artificially cool the planet?

Fossil fuel lobbyists outnumber all COP30 delegations except Brazil, report says

European Parliament backs diluted 2040 climate targets

Opponents say bill bolstering Ohio's orphan well program is too generous to the oil and gas industry

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.