plastic pollution
Newsletter
Credit: Lloyd Kimball/Unsplash
Melting ice and microplastics signal deepening disruption in Antarctica’s climate system
A team of international scientists circumnavigating Antarctica has documented widespread environmental decline, including microplastics in ice and seawater, receding glaciers, and falling ocean salinity.
In short:
- Researchers found microplastics in Antarctic glacial ice and seawater, signaling how far global plastic pollution has spread.
- Glacier retreat and increasing meltwater are diluting ocean salinity, disrupting phytoplankton populations and ocean circulation.
- Atmospheric “rivers” from Amazon forest fires carry black carbon to Antarctica, accelerating ice melt by reducing the reflectivity of snow and ice.
Key quote:
“Microplastics were visible when seawater was passed through a kind of strainer; they could even be seen through the camera lens.”
— Venisse Schossler, climatologist and mission coordinator
Why this matters:
Antarctica may seem remote, but its role in regulating the planet’s climate is immediate and vital. Its ice sheets help stabilize sea levels, and its cold waters serve as a massive carbon sink, absorbing heat and CO₂ from the atmosphere. As microplastics accumulate and glaciers melt faster, the Southern Ocean’s salinity and acidity are shifting, stressing marine life and weakening its capacity to buffer climate change. Disruption to phytoplankton — the foundation of ocean food webs and a major oxygen producer — has ripple effects throughout global ecosystems. Meanwhile, soot from Amazon fires, transported by high-altitude winds, darkens Antarctic snow, speeding melt. These linked systems show how human activities in one region can destabilize life-supporting processes halfway across the planet.
Related: Plastic debris could carry invasive species to Antarctica, threatening ecosystems
Keep reading...Show less
Credit: ffmr/Big Stock Photo
Chile moves to hold clothing importers accountable for fast fashion waste
Chile has expanded its producer responsibility law to include textiles, aiming to clean up massive clothing dumps in the Atacama Desert and shift the country toward a circular economy.
In short:
- Chile’s environment ministry now requires importers to report the volume of clothing they bring into the country, as part of a new policy targeting textile waste under its extended producer responsibility law.
- Over 90% of textiles in Chile are imported, with an estimated 123,000 tons of second-hand clothing entering the country annually — much of it ending up in illegal dumps in the Atacama Desert.
- The government plans to introduce regulations encouraging repair, reuse, and recycling, and to eliminate unregulated clothing dumpsites that often burn waste and pollute nearby communities.
Key quote:
“The inclusion of textiles in the [producer responsibility law] will establish the obligations of producers, who will no longer be able to disregard the environmental impacts of unused textiles.”
— Maisa Rojas, Chile’s environment minister
Why this matters:
Textile waste is a growing global problem, with environmental and public health consequences that often go unseen. In Chile’s Atacama Desert, used clothing imports have overwhelmed local infrastructure, creating massive dumps that leach chemicals and microfibers into the soil and air. Some clothes are burned, releasing toxic chemicals that can harm respiratory health in nearby communities. The issue reflects the broader costs of fast fashion — an industry built on rapid turnover, fossil fuel- based synthetic fibers, and global supply chains that shift waste burdens onto poorer nations. As textile production increases worldwide, unmanaged waste will likely expand, threatening both ecosystems and the people living closest to discarded goods.
Related: Why shoppers should avoid fabric blends when buying clothes
Keep reading...Show less
Credit: the blowup/Unsplash
New pricing system helps small town slash its garbage output
When Plympton, Massachusetts started charging by the bag for trash, it nearly halved the town’s garbage — and saved thousands of dollars in the process.
In short:
- Plympton cut its annual trash output from 640 to 335 tons after shifting from a flat-fee dump sticker to a “pay-as-you-throw” model charging per bag.
- The new pricing system incentivized recycling and composting, saving the town about $65,000 a year and reducing landfill-related emissions.
- Nearly half of Massachusetts municipalities now use PAYT, and experts say volume-based pricing drives waste reduction without unfairly burdening small or low-income households.
Key quote:
“We found that demand for waste disposal was really responsive to price. If you raise the price of trash, people are going to find ways to not put as much out at the curb.”
— John Halstead, retired professor of environmental economics at the University of New Hampshire and an author of a study on New Hampshire's pay-as-you-throw model
Why this matters:
Less landfill use means fewer toxics in the air and water, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and more recycled materials in circulation. Plympton’s story shows that smart policy doesn’t have to be punitive or complicated — it just has to make people see the cost of their choices, and let common sense do the rest.
Read more:
Credit: xprtshot/Big Stock Photo
New York Assembly ends session without voting on plastic packaging waste bill
New York lawmakers ended their legislative session without voting on a widely watched bill that would have made large companies financially responsible for packaging waste.
In short:
- The Packaging Reduction & Recycling Infrastructure Act passed the state Senate but stalled in the Assembly for the second year in a row, this time without a clear last-minute disruption.
- The bill would have required large corporations to pay fees based on the waste their packaging generates and reduce packaging volume by 30% over 12 years.
- Business groups opposed the bill, saying it would be expensive and burdensome; advocates criticized Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie for failing to prioritize it.
Why this matters:
Plastic waste is a growing environmental and public health threat, especially in states like New York that serve as major distribution hubs. Most single-use packaging ends up in landfills or as litter, where it breaks down into microplastics that contaminate water, soil, and the air we breathe. These particles have been found in human blood and lungs, raising concerns about long-term health effects. Meanwhile, the fossil fuels used to produce plastic continue to drive climate change. Extended producer responsibility laws shift the financial burden of managing waste away from taxpayers and onto the corporations that create it. Without such measures, states struggle to fund recycling infrastructure or curb the flood of plastic into communities, waterways, and ecosystems.
Read more:
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Steve Buissinne/Pixabay
Rising heat and plastic pollution are increasing business and insurance risks
Heatwaves, mold growth, and plastic waste are becoming costly threats to companies and insurers, driven by fossil fuel use and worsening climate impacts, according to a new risk assessment from Swiss Re.
In short:
- Reinsurer Swiss Re warns that rising temperatures, plastic pollution, and mold pose growing legal and financial risks to businesses, particularly in sectors like insurance, agriculture, and healthcare.
- Heat-related damage — from wildfires to illness and power outages — is increasing property, health, and workers’ compensation claims, as insurers retreat from high-risk areas like California.
- Plastics, made from fossil fuels, are raising liability concerns as microplastics show up in food and human bodies, prompting lawsuits and raising questions about long-term health effects.
Key quote:
“With a clear trend to longer, hotter heatwaves, it is important we shine a light on the true cost to human life, our economy, infrastructure, agriculture and healthcare system.”
— Jérôme Haegeli, group chief economist at Swiss Re
Why this matters:
Heatwaves are now the deadliest weather threat in the U.S., straining power grids, damaging crops, and spreading heat-loving molds that can sicken people and destroy buildings. Insurance markets are already shifting, with major providers retreating from fire-prone regions or hiking premiums. At the same time, plastics are flooding ecosystems and our bodies with micro-sized particles whose full range of health impacts remain poorly understood. As scientists track their spread, and courts weigh company responsibility, businesses face a new frontier of liability risk tied to pollution they once considered external. The costs of fossil fuels are increasingly difficult to ignore — in dollars, in public health, and in legal exposure.
Read more: Extreme weather isn’t the future — it’s already straining budgets and resources
Keep reading...Show less
Credit: Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash
Animals can tell us what pollution is left behind
Preserved birds, fish, and coral are helping scientists reconstruct decades of toxic pollution, filling in environmental data gaps and pointing to hidden health risks today.
In short:
- Researchers are turning to natural history museum specimens to track historical pollution, revealing how chemicals like lead and mercury have saturated both wildlife and human communities.
- A study found that house sparrows living near lead-mining towns in Australia had blood-lead levels that closely mirrored those of children living in the same areas.
- Coral skeletons from Spain’s Mediterranean coast captured fossil fuel pollution spikes from 1969 to 1992, helping pinpoint when human impact on the planet sharply accelerated.
Key quote:
“These specimens that exist in collections around the world have incidentally captured environmental samples from places and times that we can never return to, so we can use them to backfill the environmental record.”
— Shane DuBay, biologist at the University of Texas at Arlington and lead author on the study
Why this matters:
Archives of animal tissue are doing something our governments and industries often fail to do: preserving the evidence. Coral skeletons, like geological black boxes, are chronicling decades of fossil fuel pollution, pinpointing with grim precision when humanity hit the gas on planetary damage. In a world still battling with mercury, PFAS, and microplastics, the past isn’t past. It’s embedded in flesh and bone.
Read more: Why is the chemical industry pitting public health against economic growth?
Keep reading...Show less
Top Story
Credit: rbouwman/Big Stock Photo
World leaders back ocean treaty and new marine reserves, but critics say action still lags
The United Nations Ocean Summit in France ended with pledges to ratify a treaty protecting international waters, but world leaders faced pushback for slow progress and weak commitments on key issues like bottom trawling and deep-sea mining.
In short:
- Sixty heads of state and 190 ministers met in Nice for the UN ocean summit, where France announced that the high seas treaty is expected to take effect by January 2026.
- Four new nations joined calls for a ban or moratorium on deep-sea mining, while 90 ministers supported a strong global plastics treaty ahead of negotiations in August.
- Critics, including Pacific island leaders and ocean advocates, said rich nations, especially France, fell short in addressing destructive fishing practices like bottom trawling.
Key quote:
“President Macron promised action on bottom trawling in marine protected areas but delivered only artificial limits and empty words.”
— Alexandra Cousteau, adviser to Oceana and granddaughter of Jacques Cousteau
Why this matters:
Oceans are central to life on Earth, producing over half the oxygen we breathe and absorbing much of the planet’s carbon dioxide. But decades of industrial overfishing, pollution, warming, and climate-driven acidification have pushed marine ecosystems toward collapse. Bottom trawling, a fishing method that scrapes the ocean floor, destroys habitats vital to biodiversity and carbon storage. Deep-sea mining threatens to scar untouched seafloors before their ecological value is even understood. While marine protected areas and international treaties offer hope, only a fraction of the ocean is currently safeguarded. Without enforceable limits and meaningful investment, rhetoric at high-level summits risks becoming a substitute for action, leaving frontline nations and future generations to bear the cost of marine decline.
Read more: Global effort to protect international waters nears milestone as more countries back UN ocean treaty
Keep reading...Show less
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE
