michael e mann
Michael E. Mann: Legal victory highlights the ongoing battle for climate science integrity
In a recent defamation case, scientists Michael E. Mann and Peter J. Fontaine emerged victorious, highlighting the ongoing struggles against climate misinformation.
Michael E. Mann and Peter J. Fontaine write for The New York Times.
In short:
- Michael E. Mann, a climate scientist, and Peter J. Fontaine, an environmental lawyer, recently won a defamation lawsuit, emphasizing the severity of attacks on climate science.
- The court case reflects a broader issue where scientific research, especially on climate change, faces distortion and defamation.
- This victory marks a significant step for scientists to legally counteract misinformation, but also underscores the ongoing battle against climate science skepticism.
Key quote:
"We hope this sends a broader message that defamatory attacks on scientists go beyond the bounds of protected speech and have consequences."
— Michael E. Mann and Peter J. Fontaine
Why this matters:
This case not only defends the integrity of scientific research but also underscores the critical need to address climate misinformation. Understanding and acknowledging scientific facts is vital for informed public policy and health outcomes, especially as the world faces increasing environmental challenges.
Be sure to read Peter Dykstra’s 2020 piece: America re-discovers anti-science in its midst.
Climate scientist Michael Mann takes his critics to court
Michael Mann, a renowned climatologist, is embroiled in a defamation lawsuit against two right-wing bloggers, highlighting the challenges faced by scientists against ideological attacks.
In short:
- Mann, famous for his "hockey stick chart" on global temperatures, alleges defamation by bloggers who accused him of academic fraud.
- The case, which has been delayed for 12 years, exemplifies the growing trend of scientists being targeted for their work on climate change.
- Mann's lawsuit is part of a broader effort to defend scientific integrity against misinformation and ideological assaults.
Key quote:
“Mike Mann did not set out to be such a public figure ... He was just a nerdy scientist who wanted to be in his lab and do his work. And it was really the climate science deniers that made him one.”
— Susan Joy Hassol, a science communication expert
Why this matters:
This trial underscores the increasing challenges faced by scientists in defending their work against ideologically driven misinformation. It highlights the need for robust support systems to protect scientific integrity and the importance of factual accuracy in public discourse on critical issues like climate change.
Be sure to read Peter Dykstra’s thoroughly incomplete list of politicians, scientists, activists, tycoons, journalists, and philanthropists who have made a difference.
Our Fragile Earth: How close are we to climate catastrophe?
Lessons from past eras when Earth was a hothouse or a snowball tell us whether we are doomed by climate change or still have time to prevent that fate.
Michael Mann on CNN talking about SCOTUS decision undermining EPA climate policies
Michael Mann discusses the new SCOTUS decision undermining EPA's ability to regulate carbon pollution with Kristin Fisher and Boris Sanchez of CNN Newsroom (Ju...
The best climate science you’ve never heard of | Michael E. Mann
Leonardo DiCaprio a 'sweet guy,' says scientist who inspired 'Don't Look Up' role
Dr. Michael Mann: We can expect ‘more intense tornadoes’ as climate change progresses
Dr. Mann points out “a trend towards more intense tornadoes,” that has been “exacerbated by climate change,” and he advocates for Build Back Better to “address this problem at its core.”