maui
Insurers leave Maui wildfire survivors in unsafe homes, families say
Maui residents whose homes survived last year's wildfires are grappling with toxic contamination and insufficient insurance coverage to restore their homes, leaving many unable to return.
In short:
- Many Maui homeowners are battling insurers over inadequate payouts for smoke damage after the 2023 wildfires, which left homes filled with toxic residue.
- Independent experts estimate restoration costs up to four times higher than what insurers, like State Farm, are covering, leaving families displaced.
- Hawaii lacks industry standards for assessing wildfire smoke damage, leaving insurers to determine what is safe.
Key quote:
“We are not trying to make money or profit off of disaster. We just want our houses cleaned. We want to know we are safe in our homes, and we don’t know that.”
— Maria Linz, Lahaina resident
Why this matters:
As wildfires increase due to climate change, more homeowners face costly battles with insurers over smoke contamination. Without standards or regulation, families are left at risk, both financially and health-wise.
Read more: The Maui fires may cause long-term health problems
The Maui fires may cause long-term health problems
Wildfire survivors in Maui face increasing health problems, with preliminary research showing rising cases of respiratory issues, mental health struggles and exposure to heavy metals.
In short:
- Early findings from the Maui Wildfire Exposure Study show many survivors experiencing declining health, including respiratory issues and anxiety.
- Researchers have found a potential link between heavy metal exposure, particularly arsenic, and respiratory problems among participants.
- Many survivors face housing insecurity, financial pressure and difficulties accessing medical care, worsening their overall well-being.
Key quote:
“It’s exactly what we had feared and expected.”
— Pedro Haro, executive director of the American Lung Association in Hawaii
Why this matters:
The long-term health effects of the Maui fires could be similar to those experienced by survivors of the 9/11 attacks, necessitating increased medical support. Understanding these health impacts is crucial as climate change increases the frequency and intensity of wildfires globally.
Maui residents doubt settlement will restore community
A year after the devastating wildfire in Lāhainā, Maui, residents remain skeptical that a proposed $4 billion settlement will truly aid their community's recovery.
In short:
- The proposed settlement of $4 billion involves Hawaiian Electric and other defendants, but questions remain about how funds will be distributed among survivors, insurers and attorneys.
- Many displaced residents continue to struggle with housing and health issues, highlighting skepticism about the settlement's effectiveness.
- Grassroots organizations call for infrastructure funding to address long-term rebuilding rather than focusing solely on individual payouts.
Key quote:
“We have one shot to do this right. And while individual cash payouts are crucial to the immediate relief of many, they don't get us much closer to that collective objective.”
— Lāhainā Community Land Trust via social media
Why this matters:
The settlement highlights the ongoing challenges of addressing the aftermath of climate-induced disasters. Without adequate support for rebuilding, affected communities risk losing their cultural and historical identity.
Related:
Mapping wetlands in Maui aims to protect sensitive areas
Maui County has nearly finished mapping wetlands to mitigate flooding, enhance wildlife habitat, and provide other environmental benefits.
In short:
- The mapping, nearly complete, spans Maui, Molokai, and Lanai, identifying 52,000 tracts of potential wetlands.
- Some homeowners oppose the map due to fears of property devaluation and increased regulations.
- The initiative stems from a 2022 ordinance aiming to prevent further loss of wetlands and increase resilience to climate change.
Key quote:
“What we did with our county ordinance is that we stipulated that it only had to meet two of the three requirements out of the recognition that there’s lots of wetlands that we have lost and just because a place is dry doesn’t mean it couldn’t be restored to a wetland.”
— Kelly King, former County Council member
Why this matters:
Wetlands are crucial for biodiversity, flood control, and carbon sequestration. Protecting and restoring them helps combat climate change and supports ecological balance.
Maui residents struggle with health issues months after devastating fires
Months following the catastrophic fire in Lahaina, Maui, residents are facing serious health complications, including respiratory problems and psychological distress, while grappling with inadequate medical resources.
In short:
- The Maui Wildfire Exposure Study reveals a strong correlation between exposure to fire debris and adverse health outcomes.
- Local health services are overwhelmed, with significant increases in reported cases of depression and anxiety among the affected residents.
- Access to healthcare has deteriorated, impacting particularly Native Hawaiians and other minority communities in the region.
Key quote:
"You can see it in the data. We are capturing a broad insight into exposures and issues that no one has done before."
— Ruben Juarez, professor of health economics
Why this matters:
These struggles are a reminder of the long-term health consequences that can follow natural disasters, especially in areas not sufficiently equipped to handle their immediate impacts or their lingering aftermath.
Related EHN coverage:
Rebuilding in Lahaina sees easing of coastal rules after wildfires
Homeowners in Lahaina, Maui, will now find it easier to rebuild their homes damaged by recent wildfires, as state and local governments relax certain zoning laws to speed up the recovery process.
In short:
- State and county initiatives have suspended the Coastal Zone Management Act specifically for Lahaina, aiding quicker reconstruction post-wildfire.
- A new Recovery Permitting Center will focus on expediting residential rebuilding permits, though plans for commercial properties remain unclear.
- The faster permitting process is crucial for Lahaina as it transitions from disaster response to recovery, focusing on rebuilding homes and infrastructure.
Why this matters:
The easing of restrictions presents a tangible dilemma: it promises swifter reconstruction and a semblance of normalcy for residents yearning for stability, but it also raises the specter of long-term environmental costs. Proponents of the relaxed rules argue that the community's economic recovery hinges on the ability to rebuild quickly and without the red tape that often delays progress. Detractors, however, warn of a slippery slope, suggesting that leniency in the face of disaster could set a precedent for weakening environmental protections under the guise of recovery.
Related: As western wildfires become bigger and more intense, state and federal fire agencies are using more and more aerial fire retardant, prompting concerns over fish kills, aquatic life, and water quality.
Lahaina's wildfire aftermath reveals unexpected low toxicity levels
The fierce heat of the Lahaina wildfire may have played a pivotal role in diminishing the presence of toxic contaminants typically associated with such disasters.
In short:
- Renee Takesue's research shows early signs that the intense heat of Lahaina's wildfire may have neutralized many harmful chemicals.
- Investigations continue as Takesue samples soil and water across 38 sites to gauge environmental impacts and guide recovery.
- State officials have declared coastal waters safe for recreation, citing minimal contamination from the fire.
Key quote:
“What happens is that the chemicals either totally volatilize and get transported through the atmosphere or they get destroyed because the temperature is so high.”
— Renee Takesue, USGS scientist
Why this matters:
While these fires have left behind charred landscapes and displaced communities, they have also catalyzed the breakdown of certain pollutants present in the environment.
Related: As western wildfires become bigger and more intense, state and federal fire agencies are using more and more aerial fire retardant, prompting concerns over fish kills, aquatic life, and water quality.