fossil fuel investments

Top Tweets
A gleaming glass skyscraper with the word Allianz on the top.
Hands of a man sitting at a desk with a laptop filling out a paper form with a pen.
Wind turbines in the distance with a yellow field in the foreground and a blue sky in the background.
A sign in front of a Max-Planck Institut building with bushes nearby.
pittsburgh
Photo by Willie Shaw on Unsplash

Pittsburgh in ‘extreme embrace’ with fossil fuel lobbyists, research finds

Dozens of governmental, educational, cultural and environmental organizations across the city of Pittsburgh have hired lobbying firms who work with planet-heating fossil fuel companies, new research shows.

rich countries fossil fuels justice climate
Big Stock Photo

Rich countries ‘trap’ poor nations into relying on fossil fuels

Kaamil Ahmed reports for The Guardian that campaigners are criticizing a ‘new form of colonialism’, where countries in the global south are forced to invest in fossil fuel projects to repay debts.

In a nutshell:

Wealthier nations and private lenders are ensnaring heavily indebted countries in a cycle of fossil fuel dependence, asserts a recent study. The report reveals that mounting debt pressures are compelling impoverished nations to persist in fossil fuel projects to meet repayment obligations stemming from loans extended by more affluent countries and financial institutions. Debt Justice and their partners in affected nations are urging creditors to absolve indebted countries, particularly those associated with fossil fuel ventures. The study discloses that debt owed by developing nations has surged by 150% since 2011, with 54 countries now grappling with debt crises that divert resources away from climate crisis mitigation.

Key quote:

“High debt levels are a major barrier to phasing out fossil fuels for many global south countries,” said Tess Woolfenden, a senior policy officer at Debt Justice. “Many countries are trapped exploiting fossil fuels to generate revenue to repay debt while, at the same time, fossil fuel projects often do not generate the revenues expected and can leave countries further indebted than when they started. This toxic trap must end.”

The big picture:

Heavy reliance on fossil fuels often takes a toll on public health. The burning of these fuels releases noxious pollutants and greenhouse gases that diminish air quality, contributing to a surge in respiratory illnesses, cardiovascular diseases and premature deaths. Often lacking the resources for proper pollution control and healthcare, poor countries bear the brunt of the health impacts as the toxic cocktails of pollutants impact vulnerable populations and create entrenched health disparities.

Read the article in The Guardian.

Go deeper: Last year, Agents of Change fellow Daniel Carrión argued that combating energy poverty and energy insecurity are critical elements to achieving environmental health equity for billions worldwide.

Keep reading...Show less
Private equity’s dirty dozen: the 12 US firms funding dirty energy projects

Private equity’s dirty dozen: the 12 US firms funding dirty energy projects

A report, shared exclusively with the Guardian, provides a snapshot of industry’s involvement in some of the country’s most controversial fossil fuel investments.

Russian arctic resource extraction

Big oil, gas and coal making headway on Russian Arctic coast

Hundreds of ships loaded with construction materials shuttle to the sites of new nonrenewable energy projects.
future of fossil fuel investments

What is the future for fossil fuel investments?

With the IPCC's latest report warning that time is running out to avoid climate catastrophe, the world's reliance on fossil fuels is increasingly untenable. Investors are starting to look for green alternatives.
Bill McKibben on Wall Street & climate
www.newyorker.com

Bill McKibben: Can Wall Street’s heaviest hitter step up to the plate on climate change?

More significant than BlackRock executives’s pledges is the firm’s continued inclusion of fossil-fuel companies in its index funds.
Defund or defend? In the fight over fossil fuel investments, who's winning?
therevelator.org

Defund or defend? In the fight over fossil fuel investments, who's winning?

Despite divestment victories, big banks and asset managers continue driving climate change through their lending practices.
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE