forest management
Forest policy debates could shape, but not shift, national forest management
As November’s election approaches, the battle over how we manage national forests heats up, but the day-to-day work in these forests is likely to stay on course.
In short:
- The Forest Service’s work, including logging and fire management, is expected to continue regardless of election outcomes.
- Major funding from the Inflation Reduction Act and the bipartisan infrastructure law will keep driving forest management projects, though future funding could be uncertain.
- The biggest policy divide may focus on protecting old-growth forests, with Democrats likely pushing for more conservation and Republicans favoring resource management.
Key quote:
“There isn’t much controversy over the need to do more to improve the health of the national forests.”
— Bill Imbergamo, executive director of the Federal Forest Resource Coalition
Why this matters:
No matter the outcome of this fall's elections, the U.S. Forest Service's operations will roll on, driven by its army of career employees, not political appointees. Emphasis on a fire-first approach exemplifies the challenge of balancing immediate threats with long-term forest health. Read more: The push for standing forest protections in US climate policy.
As tree species face decline, ‘assisted migration’ gains popularity in Pacific Northwest
Fire, other ravages jeopardize California’s prized forests
Forests are worth more than their carbon, a new paper argues
Experts say carbon sequestration projects that don’t prioritize biodiversity may be doing more harm than good, including to the climate.
Pa groups thrilled by Biden’s American Climate Corps, but wish it were bigger
Patrick Brown criticized his own wildfire study. An uproar ensued.
BigStock Photo ID: 471214273 |
Copyright: Pixelbliss |
When it comes to packaging, what’s actually sustainable?
An expert unpacks the paper versus plastic debate, concerns about forever chemicals, and Tim Hortons’ pulp fibre lids.