finance
Azerbaijan seeks contributions from fossil fuel producers for new climate fund
Azerbaijan, hosting the Cop29 summit in November, is asking fossil fuel-producing countries and companies to fund a new initiative to help poorer nations combat climate change.
In short:
- Azerbaijan is setting up the Climate Finance Action Fund to receive contributions from fossil fuel countries and companies.
- The fund aims to invest in projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build resilience in developing countries.
- Contributions are voluntary, with no enforcement mechanism proposed.
Key quote:
"Traditional funding methods have proven to be inadequate to the challenges of the climate crisis, so we have decided on a different approach."
— Yalchin Rafiyev, chief negotiator for the Cop29 presidency
Why this matters:
Voluntary contributions from fossil fuel producers to a climate fund could be a step towards holding these entities accountable for their emissions. However, without mandatory enforcement, the fund's impact may be limited.
Related EHN coverage:
Carbon-credit market needs reform to survive, study finds
The carbon-credit industry must implement rigorous standards or face extinction, according to a new international review.
In short:
- The carbon-credit market shrank significantly last year due to reports questioning the environmental impact of many schemes.
- Experts from the Climate Crisis Advisory Group suggest that proper reform could generate billions for climate action.
- Recommendations include adopting scientific standards, ensuring financial benefits for local communities and prioritizing carbon-removal projects.
Key quote:
"The voluntary carbon market is very reluctant to take this fully on board. Our report is totally independent of them. It is going to be challenging, but our simple message is that unless you do this, you’re out of business."
— Sir David King, former UK chief scientific adviser and head of the Climate Crisis Advisory Group.
Why this matters:
Carbon credits have been presented as a pivotal tool in the fight against climate change, offering a mechanism for businesses to compensate for their carbon footprint by funding projects that reduce or absorb CO2 emissions. However, the lack of stringent standards has led to inconsistencies and allegations of greenwashing, where companies claim environmental benefits without substantial actions.
The US defends its oil and gas expansion despite climate finance promises
The Biden administration promises to lead global climate finance efforts, yet faces criticism for expanding oil and gas production amid its climate goals.
In short:
- The US promises to lead in climate finance but does not specify the amount to be provided to poorer countries.
- John Podesta, Biden’s top climate official, supports the expansion of US oil and gas production due to the high demand for non-Russian energy sources.
- Podesta highlights the stark contrast between Biden and Trump on climate commitments and the need for other major economies to contribute more.
Key quote:
"The US is now the number one producer of oil and gas in the world, the number one exporter of natural gas, and that’s a good thing."
— John Podesta, senior adviser to Joe Biden on international climate policy
Why this matters:
The U.S. continues to expand its fossil fuel infrastructure. New oil and gas projects, including pipelines and drilling operations, are moving forward, driven by economic interests and energy security concerns. This expansion poses a significant challenge to meeting climate targets, as fossil fuels remain the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.
China and the EU discuss potential tariff hikes on Chinese electric vehicles
China and the European Union are considering negotiations over the EU's decision to significantly increase tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles.
In short:
- The EU plans to impose provisional tariffs of 17.4% to 38.1% on Chinese-made EVs starting July 4, citing unfair subsidies that harm EU automakers.
- Both China and Germany's economy minister expressed willingness to hold discussions to resolve the dispute before the tariffs take effect.
- China is also investigating European pork imports, which may be a response to the EU's EV tariff measures.
Key quote:
“The doors are open for discussions. And I hope that this message was heard.”
— Robert Habeck, Germany’s economy minister and vice chancellor
Why this matters:
Increased tariffs could escalate trade tensions between China and the EU, impacting global trade and the electric vehicle market. An agreement could help avoid further economic conflict and support fair competition in the automotive industry.
Royal Bank of Canada faces scrutiny for funding fossil fuel projects
RBC is under fire for its continued financing of fossil fuel projects, despite its public stance on climate change and support for Indigenous rights.
In short:
- RBC president David McKay claimed the bank is a leader in addressing climate change, but it remains the top fossil fuel financier among Canada's big five banks.
- Jocey Alec, a Wet’suwet’en land defender, confronted RBC about its role in the Coastal GasLink pipeline but was cut off after 11 seconds at a shareholder meeting.
- After pressure from New York City, RBC agreed to disclose its financial ties to fossil fuel projects compared to clean energy sources.
Key quote:
"I feel like they do get the message, but they just don’t want to acknowledge their complicity on what they’re funding."
— Jocey Alec, Wet’suwet’en land defender
Why this matters:
RBC's financing decisions have significant environmental and social implications, particularly for Indigenous communities opposing fossil fuel projects. Public scrutiny and shareholder pressure could push the bank to more transparent and sustainable practices.
GOP accuses Wall Street firms of climate collusion
House Republicans released a report accusing major investment firms of colluding with climate groups to push for environmentally friendly investing, sparking a new controversy over ESG practices.
In short:
- House Judiciary Committee Republicans claim BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are part of a “climate cartel.”
- The report targets activist group Climate Action 100+ for allegedly pressuring asset managers to adopt climate-focused investments.
- The GOP criticizes the Biden administration for not investigating these alleged collusions.
Key quote:
“Investors who undertake investor stewardship on climate change are pursuing a common-sense approach driven by the pursuit of delivering the best long-term returns for their clients and beneficiaries.”
— Climate Action 100+ spokesperson
Why this matters:
This controversy highlights the political tension over ESG investing, which influences how major firms allocate resources and address climate change. With extreme weather events becoming more frequent and severe, the urgency for sustainable solutions has never been greater. Advocates argue that the financial sector must play a pivotal role in this transformation by redirecting capital towards projects and companies that support a low-carbon future.
Growing debt payments hinder climate action in vulnerable countries
Debt payments by the 50 countries most vulnerable to the climate crisis have doubled since the pandemic, hindering their ability to address global heating.
In short:
- Vulnerable countries now spend 15.5% of government revenues on debt payments, up from 8% before COVID-19.
- The debt burden increase is attributed to the end of a debt suspension scheme, rising global interest rates, and a strong US dollar.
- A conference in Bonn will address climate finance and unsustainable debt levels, highlighting the urgent need for debt relief.
Key quote:
“Record levels of debt are crushing the ability of the most vulnerable countries to tackle the climate emergency.”
— Heidi Chow, executive director of Debt Justice
Why this matters:
High debt payments limit the capacity of vulnerable countries to invest in climate mitigation and adaptation, worsening the impacts of climate change and deepening economic instability. These countries, often located in regions already suffering the most severe impacts of climate change, are now forced to divert critical resources to servicing debt rather than investing in sustainable infrastructure, disaster preparedness, and environmental protection. The rising debt payments are squeezing budgets, leaving less room for essential climate adaptation and mitigation strategies.