commercial fishing
US ocean protection plan includes commercial fishing areas, sparking debate
New information reveals the Biden administration’s ocean conservation strategy considers areas with commercial fishing as protected, causing concern among scientists.
In short:
- The U.S. aims to preserve 30% of its marine areas, counting some zones that allow commercial fishing as protected.
- Scientists argue that allowing commercial fishing undermines the conservation goals intended to support biodiversity.
- The debate highlights differing global standards on what qualifies as a conserved area.
Key quote:
“Saying that these areas that are touted to be for biodiversity conservation should also do double duty for fishing as well, especially highly impactful gears that are for large-scale commercial take, there’s just a cognitive dissonance there.”
— Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, marine biologist at Oregon State University
Why this matters:
Environmentalists argue that commercial fishing in protected areas can undermine conservation goals. These areas are often designated to help replenish fish stocks and protect diverse marine ecosystems. However, fishing activities, especially those involving trawling or large-scale nets, can damage habitats and lead to overfishing, threatening the very species these zones aim to protect.
Lobstermen face hypoxia in Outer Cape waters
Low oxygen levels linked to warmer water spell trouble for local lobsters.
Marine protected areas, explained
For whales and crabbers, finding balance is getting harder
California salmon stocks are crashing. A fishing ban looks certain.
Whole Foods to stop buying Maine lobster amid risk to endangered species
Fish-feed industry turns to krill, with unknown effects on the Antarctic ecosystem
The global growth of fish farming is driving the demand for Antarctic krill as an alternative to wild fish in fish feeds, amid the depletion of many wild fish stocks.