colorado pollution
Colorado's air quality and lobbying conflicts exposed in new report
Fossil fuel lobbyists in Colorado represent both polluters and environmental advocates, creating a significant conflict of interest in air quality legislation, reveals a recent investigation by F Minus and Brown University's Climate and Development Lab.
In short:
- The report uncovers lobbying firms in Colorado working for both sides of environmental legislation, raising concerns about their effectiveness and loyalty.
- High pollution levels in Colorado communities contrast starkly with the state's legislative inaction, influenced by conflicting lobbying efforts.
- The dual representation includes cases where lobbyists represent both oil and gas interests and public health entities affected by pollution.
Key quote:
“Residents’ tax dollars are essentially going into the pockets of fossil fuel lobbyists, which is crazy.”
— James Browning, founder and executive director of F Minus
Why this matters:
Colorado, known for its pristine landscapes and outdoor lifestyle, is at a crossroads with its air quality challenges. The Denver metro area, in particular, has struggled to meet federal ozone standards. Fossil fuel emissions are a significant contributor to this issue, which not only clouds the picturesque view but also poses serious health risks to the population. Elevated ozone levels can exacerbate asthma, decrease lung function, and increase visits to emergency rooms.
Smog across the Front Range is going to make gas more expensive. But do the clean air benefits justify the cost to consumers?
As foul smog continues to hover along the Front Range horizon, millions of Colorado drivers will pay more for a special formula of gasoline that is supposed to cause less pollution.
Colorado set to miss 2024 deadline to reduce ozone pollution
An independent board tasked with improving Colorado’s air quality believes the state will fall short of meeting an Environmental Protection Agency requirement to lower toxic air pollution by 2024, but will be able to reach an older, more lax emissions-reduction target three years later.