Supreme Court case could drastically alter federal enforcement on environmental and investment issues

The outcome of a pivotal Supreme Court case could dramatically reshape federal authority in tackling investment fraud and environmental violations.

— Pamela King reports for E&E News.

In short:

• The case, SEC v. Jarkesy, questions the extent of federal agencies' power in penalizing investment fraud.
• Implications extend to environmental enforcement at agencies like the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency, affecting polluters and infrastructure projects.
• The decision could redefine the scope of federal regulatory authority.

Key quote:

"“I am inherently suspicious of reforms that are being strongly advocated by actors who need strong policing."

— Gillian Giannetti, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Why this matters:

This case could significantly impact health and safety regulations, potentially altering how the government manages environmental and financial misconduct and enforces rules.

How would changes in federal enforcement affect your community or profession?