States debate supporting coal plants amid energy transition
In a bid to keep coal plants operational despite economic and environmental pressures, Republican lawmakers in several states are pushing legislation that could use taxpayer funds to prevent closures, signaling a contentious battle over the future of energy.
Jason Plautz and Jeffrey Tomich report for E&E News.
In short:
- Legislation in states like Utah and Kansas seeks to empower state intervention in coal plant retirements, potentially using taxpayer money for purchases.
- Critics argue these efforts counter economic sense and environmental progress, as coal plants are costlier than renewable alternatives.
- The proposed laws reflect a broader national discussion on energy security and the pace of transitioning to renewable sources.
Key quote:
"We view these bills as a policy statement by the Legislature that coal is important to Kansas’ generation fleet."
— Gina Penzig, spokesperson for Evergy
Why this matters:
These legislative efforts underscore the tension between preserving traditional energy jobs and meeting climate goals. However, the closure of coal plants often coincides with a transition toward cleaner energy sources, such as wind, solar, and natural gas, which may mitigate those coal plant job losses.
Two 2018 studies show significantly fewer health risks for babies after nearby coal plants close.
