Political debate over U.S. Steel sale ignores public health and environmental risks

A potential $15 billion sale of U.S. Steel to Nippon Steel has sparked political controversy, leaving pollution and public health concerns in the Mon Valley largely overlooked.

Kiley Bense reports for Inside Climate News.

In short:

U.S. Steel’s Pennsylvania facilities have long contributed to severe air pollution affecting local communities.
The sale has turned into a political debate, focusing on swing state voters and economic concerns rather than addressing environmental or health issues.
Nippon Steel’s promised investments might extend coal-based steelmaking, raising concerns about continued pollution.

Key quote:

“People are being treated like pawns, and no one’s really listening to voices of the community for what they need.”

— Matt Mehalik, the executive director at Breathe Project

Why this matters:

Steelmaking plants are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and local air pollution. Continuing coal-based production could lock in pollution for decades, impacting both the climate and the health of nearby communities.

Related EHN coverage:

insideclimatenews.org

Political debate over U.S. Steel sale ignores public health and environmental risks

Hope is contagious and science is king: 10 big lessons on ending the fossil fuel era

The SEC tried to silence activist investors. Now they're fighting back

With promises of money, controversial gas pipeline on Navajo Nation passes first hurdle

Congress once shielded gun makers. Now it’s fossil fuel companies’ turn

Western lawmakers move to weaken Clean Air Act and shield fossil fuel companies from climate lawsuits

States are demanding property insurance records to study climate change

In permissive Amsterdam, ads for fossil fuels or meat are now verboden

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.