www.nationalgeographic.com
07 July 2020
Journey to the world's southernmost tree
Where on this warming planet, you ask, is the southernmost tree? Look no further: National Geographic sent a team to hunt it down.
www.ehn.org
“This is not normal.”
Nearly 70 petrochemical companies across the nation, including 30 in Texas, are sending millions of pounds of pollutants into waterways each year due to weak or nonexistent regulations, according to a report published by the watchdog group Environmental Integrity Project.
The report analyzed wastewater discharges from petrochemical companies that produce plastics across the U.S., finding that a majority of the facilities had violated Clean Water Act permits and few were punished. In addition, only a few states are regulating some of the hazardous chemicals or substances of concern, and there are currently no limits set from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for these contaminants in effluent water guidelines for the plastics industry.
In the past 30 years, plastic production at petrochemical facilities has skyrocketed. The EPA estimates that plastic production in 1990 was at 17,130 tons, and by 2018 it had doubled, reaching 35,680 tons. Producing these plastics results in industrial wastewater discharges, some of which contain pollutants unregulated by federal wastewater guidelines. If the pollutant does have limits, they have been set by individual states.
The report found the following pollutants:
A majority of the facilities have poor compliance records. Out of the 70 facilities, 83% had violated the Clean Water Act at least once in the last three years (58 facilities violated permits, yet only 8 were penalized). Nearly 40% of the facilities were operating on water pollution control permits that are outdated, “but have been administratively continued by state agencies,” according to the report.
The Clean Water Act, issued by the EPA in 1972, has historically been enforced through effluent water guidelines. The petrochemical facilities in the report are regulated under a category of guidelines for organic chemicals, plastics and synthetic fibers.
“The (plastics) industry has experienced significant, rapid growth in recent decades and is continuing to grow,” lead author of the report and research director at the Environmental Integrity Project, Kira Dunham, told EHN. “But…wastewater discharges are being regulated by standards from over 30 years ago.”
This category of guidelines Dunham mentions has not been updated by the EPA since 1993, despite requirements for the agency to “periodically” update guidelines in accordance with technological updates for pollution control.With 17 of the 30 facilities in Texas, the Houston area — known as the petrochemical capital of the U.S. — is the number one exporter of petrochemicals in the nation.
Nearly one-third of these Texas facilities discharge wastewater into the Houston Ship Channel. Earlier this year, EHN investigated community member concerns about wastewater contamination potentially entering dredge material removed from the channel. Independent analysis from Healthy Port Communities, a collaborative of Houston-based environmental groups, noted high levels of dioxins in the soil surrounding dredge material.
“Some of the places touched on in the (Environmental Integrity Project’s) report might have one major facility that has this… pattern of discharging pollutants into waterways,” Kristen Schlemmer, senior legal director of Houston- based water justice group Bayou City Waterkeeper, told EHN. “I don't want to discount that … but it at least makes it clear who you can focus on to address the problem. Whereas in Houston, we have so many different facilities that are polluting into our waterways, that it often just makes it seem like that's normal, and that's just the way things are going to be.”
Schlemmer added that these concerns for pollution related to wastewater discharges are heightened by disasters, like this year’s derecho storm and Hurricane Beryl, in which water grows contaminated across large portions of the region. Beyond climate disasters, the Houston region is prone to chemical disasters and the state averages about one chemical release a week based on 2023 data.
“I'm hoping through this work to show that this is not normal, and (to) raise the bar in terms of what our expectations are for the facilities that live in our backyards,” Schlemmer said. “If they're not going to comply with the law …I want them to … know that they're going to be facing legal action, either from us or for government regulators.”
Earlier this year, the Environmental Integrity Project sued the EPA along with Bayou City Water Keeper, the Center for Biological Diversity and nearly 300 water justice groups in the Waterkeeper Alliance. In the original intent to sue, the group states that the EPA “has failed to perform its mandatory duty under (the Clean Water Act) ... to biennially submit state water quality reports and an analysis thereof … to Congress.”
Just last week, the EPA released its biannual preliminary plan for effluent limitations guidelines and the announcement states that the EPA plans to conduct new studies that will clarify the impact of discharges from certain industries on waterways. The plan is open for public comment here.
Montana's Supreme Court has upheld a landmark ruling affirming young people's constitutional right to a "clean and healthful environment," striking down state laws that limited the review of greenhouse gas emissions and cementing the state's climate protections.
In short:
Key quote:
“This ruling is a victory not just for us, but for every young person whose future is threatened by climate change.”
— Rikki Held, lead plaintiff
Why this matters:
This historic decision demonstrates the power of constitutional rights in combating climate change, showing how legal action can drive accountability. This ruling could be a lifeline for a generation already breathing in the costs of inaction.
Read more: Youth v. Montana — Young adults speak up, and watch the video below.
The International Court of Justice is reviewing requests from developing nations to define the legal obligations of wealthier countries whose emissions have driven climate change.
In short:
Key quote:
“If one uses, or allows their property to be used, in a manner to cause harm to another, that harm must be stopped and reparations paid in full.”
— Ernestine K. Rengiil, Palau Attorney General
Why this matters:
Developing nations suffer most from a climate crisis they didn’t cause. A legal precedent holding wealthier nations accountable could spur meaningful emissions cuts and climate reparations, reshaping global climate justice.
Coal use worldwide is projected to peak at 8.7 billion tons this year, driven by energy demand spikes following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
In short:
Key quote:
“The rapid deployment of clean energy technologies is reshaping the global electricity sector, which accounts for two-thirds of the world’s coal use. As a result, our models show global demand for coal plateauing through 2027 even as electricity consumption rises sharply.”
— Keisuke Sadamori, IEA director of energy markets and security
Why this matters:
The surge in coal use reverses climate progress and increases greenhouse gas emissions. While developed nations move away from coal, rising demand in China and India underscores the challenge of transitioning to clean energy globally.
Meanwhile in the U.S.:
Experts warn that while renewable energy is growing rapidly, only significant reductions in fossil fuel use can prevent catastrophic climate change and environmental collapse.
In short:
Key quote:
“We have solutions to scale down our use of coal, oil and gas. We know how to feed humanity from sustainable food systems, that largely bring us back into the [safe zone for] planetary boundaries, the safe space for nitrogen, phosphorous, freshwater, land and biodiversity.”
— Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Why this matters:
Transitioning to renewables isn’t enough without slashing fossil fuel use and reducing overall consumption. Failing to act decisively threatens a sixth mass extinction and irreversible environmental damage.
Related: Activists urge insurers to cut ties with fossil fuels in London protests
Congress is set to vote on a stopgap funding bill that provides $100 billion in disaster relief but omits conservation funding from the Inflation Reduction Act.
In short:
Key quote:
“It’s almost like by leaving that [out], by not rolling it into the baseline, now it’s allowed to continue President [Joe] Biden’s New Green Deal.”
— Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.)
Why this matters:
The exclusion of conservation funding limits long-term investments in environmental initiatives. The $100 billion for disaster relief addresses immediate needs, but omitting conservation funds risks undermining climate resilience and sustainable agriculture efforts.
Related: FEMA faces potential funding shortfall amid increasing natural disasters
A warming climate is driving insurers to drop homeowners, making mortgages and homeownership increasingly unattainable in high-risk areas.
In short:
Key quote:
"We used to take our wildland gear home, put it into storage about September, and then bring it back to the station in February. Now it doesn’t leave the trucks."
— Milo Lambert, Silver City’s fire chief
Why this matters:
Homeowners across the country are increasingly vulnerable as insurers retreat due to escalating climate risks. This trend threatens access to mortgages, local tax revenue and community stability, potentially forcing residents to abandon homes in high-risk areas.
The leadership team talks about what they’ve learned — and what lies ahead.
Top polluters are benefiting the most from tax breaks.
Legal and industry experts say there are uncertainties about the future of hydrogen hubs, a cornerstone of the Biden administration’s clean energy push.
The tale of “jobs versus the environment” does not capture the full story.
La narrativa de “empleos vs. proteger el medio ambiente” no cuenta la historia completa.
“They’ve been able to combine forces and really come forward to bring social and environmental change.”