joe biden
Credit: The White House

Biden finalizes long-awaited hydrogen tax credits ahead of Trump presidency

Responses to the new rules have been mixed, and environmental advocates worry that Trump could undermine them.

The Biden administration has finalized long-anticipated hydrogen tax credit rules just weeks before Trump takes office.

The rules, set by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, will determine when hydrogen producers can claim substantial tax credits intended to incentivize the production of clean hydrogen energy.


The draft rules received over 30,000 comments from industry groups and environmental advocates alike that Treasury and the IRS spent the last two years interpreting. While concessions were made on both sides, the reception of the rule has been mixed and the rule could be subject to change under the Trump administration.

The Biden administration has pushed for clean hydrogen production to decarbonize heavy industries that are difficult to electrify, like trucking and steelmaking. Hydrogen is often more expensive to produce than traditional energy sources, so the tax credits were created to decrease costs for the producer and allow hydrogen to compete with traditional energy sources in foreign and domestic markets.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Hydrogen can be produced through a variety of methods with varying carbon emissions. Clean hydrogen is defined by the new rules as creating up to four kilograms of carbon emissions per every kilogram of hydrogen produced. Credit-eligible hydrogen production has two pathways, electricity or methane. Eligible electricity sources include renewables like solar and wind, but also nuclear. Additionally, hydrogen production from methane, whether using natural gas, steam reforming or coal mining, is also included with the addition of carbon capture technologies to reduce emissions.

The tax credit, which producers can claim for up to a decade, operates on a tiered system that rewards hydrogen producers with the lowest carbon intensity with the largest credit of $3 per kilogram and is scaled down to about 60 cents per kilogram. The program will expire on Jan. 1, 2033, meaning facilities must begin construction by this date if they wish to claim the credit.

Concessions and Changes

Reception of the final hydrogen rules have been mixed. In the 30,000 comments made on the draft rules, industry groups requested things like more pathways for natural gas and looser requirements for clean hydrogen production, while many environmentalists requested a heavier emphasis on renewable energy and strengthened emissions calculations.

Beyond the concerns about rules, many stakeholders have spoken out against federally-funded hydrogen development, citing a lack of transparency and lack of public involvement in the decision-making process.

Environmental groups have supported “three pillars” as safeguards for hydrogen production and lobbied for them to remain in the final rules: incrementality, temporal matching and deliverability. They’re complex, but they aim to ensure that hydrogen growth is from new, sustainable facilities (incremental), that hydrogen facilities can produce energy supply to meet a demand (temporal matching) and that hydrogen is reliably delivered (deliverability). These three pillars, in theory and supported by studies, should prevent imbalances that could inadvertently result in more carbon emissions than not producing hydrogen to begin with. These safeguards specifically apply to hydrogen using electricity, whether from renewables or nuclear sources.

While the principles of the three pillars did remain in the final rule, they did not go untouched.

“There have been a lot of concessions,” Matt Lifson, an attorney with the Institute for Policy Integrity at the NYU School of Law, told EHN. “The Treasury did give industry a bunch of things that it asked for.”

For example, Lifson said, there are some exceptions for existing nuclear facilities that will be allowed to claim the credits despite not being new sources of energy, and some rules are more lax in states like California or Washington due to their “robust greenhouse gas emission caps,” according to the Treasury.

“One of the [federal] hydrogen hubs is in California, [and] one of the hydrogen hubs is in the Pacific Northwest,” Lifson noted. “So that [exemption] will make it easier for those hubs…And going back to the nuclear issue, several of those hubs involve hydrogen made from nuclear energy.”

Other concessions included more flexible timelines and deadlines on production standards, which some hydrogen producers praised.

“The new hydrogen rules mark significant progress, with notable revisions,” Plug Power, a hydrogen fuel cell company said in a statement. “While these updates are encouraging, we look forward to collaborating with the new administration to refine the regulations.”

Will the rules hold under a Trump presidency?

Donald Trump Trump administration plans to overhaul Interior Department with budget cuts and policy reversalsCredit: palinchak/Big Stock Photo

In a matter of days the Trump administration will have the ability to challenge the hydrogen rules under the Congressional Review Act.

“There's still the possibility that the rules could change under the Trump administration,” Lifson said. “So I don't know how much certainty we really have.”

There are a few factors that could prevent the rules from being invalidated. Amidst more pressing issues, hydrogen production might not make it onto Trump’s priority list for his first 100 days in office, and congressional review must be conducted within 60 days of a rule being published. Even if Trump does tackle the new rules on time, the process requires a majority vote, which could be difficult to achieve since the hydrogen credit rule has bipartisan support and the incoming Republican Congress will hold the majority on a thin margin.

“There is always a chance that this is an acceptable compromise between various segments of industry and the environmental community and that [the final rules] could hold,” Lifson said. “There's also the fact that if the Trump administration wanted to rewrite the regulations through its own rulemaking, they would need to rationally explain any departures that they made from the Biden rule. It can't just be a ‘because we said so’ type of thing.”

Demonstrators hold signs supporting science on a rainy day, with the US Capitol building in background.
Credit: Adam Fagen/Flickr

Trump’s science attacks trigger urgent warning from leading researchers

In an extraordinary move, nearly 2,000 top U.S. scientists are sounding the alarm about what they say is a deliberate campaign to dismantle science under the Trump administration.

Jessica Glenza reports for The Guardian.

Keep reading...Show less
Senator Whitehouse & climate change

Senator Whitehouse puts climate change on budget committee’s agenda

For more than a decade, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse gave daily warnings about the mounting threat of climate change. Now he has a powerful new perch.
Aerial view of rows of solar panels lined up on a green field.

Trump administration considers major cuts to clean energy programs, drawing bipartisan pushback

Lawmakers from both parties are pressing the U.S. Department of Energy to preserve billions in clean energy investments after draft lists of possible project cuts began circulating on Capitol Hill.

James Bikales, Josh Siegel, Kelsey Tamborrino and Ben Lefebvre report for POLITICO.

Keep reading...Show less
Closeup of the FEMA webpage.

FEMA freezes $10 billion in disaster aid for nonprofits amid immigration review

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has halted $10 billion in disaster aid for nonprofits while reviewing whether the funds comply with President Trump’s executive order targeting undocumented migrants.

Thomas Frank reports for E&E News.

Keep reading...Show less
Power station smokestacks with pollution billowing from the top.

Zeldin shifts EPA toward deregulation and fossil fuel industry allies

Lee Zeldin, once a climate-conscious Republican from New York, is now steering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to roll back regulations, slash staff, and align with Trump and Elon Musk’s deregulatory vision.

Lisa Friedman reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
Person sitting with hands clasped over open bible.

Faith leaders challenge EPA's climate stance amid deregulatory push

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin’s remarks dismissing climate action as “religion” have sparked backlash from Jewish and Christian leaders, who argue for stronger environmental protections rooted in faith-based values.

James Bruggers reports for Inside Climate News.

Keep reading...Show less
Young girl leaning on wall during daytime.

Climate disasters disrupt education for Black children, deepening inequities

Black students in the U.S. face growing educational setbacks as climate-driven disasters like wildfires and hurricanes destroy schools, displace families, and exacerbate systemic inequalities.

Adam Mahoney reports for Capital B News.

Keep reading...Show less
A steel bridge over a dry rocky gully with scrubby trees in foreground.

New Mexico moves to protect workers from extreme heat with proposed rules

Officials in New Mexico are advancing new workplace safety rules that would require employers to protect workers from heat-related illnesses as temperatures continue to rise.

Danielle Prokop reports for Source New Mexico.

Keep reading...Show less
From our Newsroom
silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

People  sitting in an outdoors table working on a big sign.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.

Op-ed: Toxic prisons teach us that environmental justice needs abolition

Op-ed: Toxic prisons teach us that environmental justice needs abolition

Prisons, jails and detention centers are placed in locations where environmental hazards such as toxic landfills, floods and extreme heat are the norm.

Agents of Change in Environmental Justice logo

LISTEN: Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

The leadership team talks about what they’ve learned — and what lies ahead.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.