Man in green jacket with the word Greenpeace on the back walking on street during daytime.

Greenpeace faces tough legal battle over Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Greenpeace is fighting a multimillion-dollar lawsuit from Energy Transfer, which claims the environmental group played a major role in protests that delayed construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Karen Zraick reports for The New York Times.

In short:

Greenpeace asked North Dakota’s Supreme Court to move the trial out of Morton County, arguing the jury is biased due to the pipeline protests that disrupted local life in 2016-2017.
Energy Transfer accuses Greenpeace of defamation, inciting violence, and supporting protest tactics that damaged equipment and delayed construction.
If Greenpeace loses, the judgment could total hundreds of millions of dollars, potentially forcing the group to shut down U.S. operations.

Key quote:

“With jury selection complete, it is clearer now than ever that Greenpeace defendants will not get a fair and impartial trial in the county where the protests occurred.”

— Greenpeace legal filing

Why this matters:

The case tests how far companies can go in suing advocacy groups over protests. Energy Transfer's lawsuit follows a broader trend of corporations using legal action to target activists, potentially chilling environmental and social movements. The Dakota Access Pipeline protests centered on Native American land rights and water protection, issues still at the forefront of environmental justice debates. A ruling against Greenpeace could have lasting effects on how advocacy groups operate in the U.S.

www.nytimes.com

Senator Whitehouse puts climate change on budget committee’s agenda

For more than a decade, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse gave daily warnings about the mounting threat of climate change. Now he has a powerful new perch.

Greenpeace faces tough legal battle over Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Major U.S. banks drop out of climate pledge, raising calls for regulation

NOAA layoffs raise legal concerns and could weaken public safety

Trump orders expansion of U.S. timber production, citing national security

China’s clean energy dominance reshapes global markets

Wildfires force evacuations and emergency response in the Carolinas

Climate disasters challenge the myth of ‘safe’ havens

Opinion: EPA’s climate denial rejects America’s own science

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.

Biden finalizes long-awaited hydrogen tax credits ahead of Trump presidency

Responses to the new rules have been mixed, and environmental advocates worry that Trump could undermine them.

Op-ed: Toxic prisons teach us that environmental justice needs abolition

Prisons, jails and detention centers are placed in locations where environmental hazards such as toxic landfills, floods and extreme heat are the norm.

LISTEN: Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

The leadership team talks about what they’ve learned — and what lies ahead.

Study shows $1 billion in lost tax revenue in Houston area from industry tax breaks

Top polluters are benefiting the most from tax breaks.