Scientist in white lab coat, goggles, and gloves pouring substance into beaker.

Credit: CDC/Unsplash

EPA’s research office faces deep cuts, sparking alarm over environmental protections

The potential elimination of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development could result in mass layoffs of scientists and weaken the agency’s ability to assess and respond to environmental threats.

Aman Azhar reports for Inside Climate News.

In short:

Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former EPA science official, warns that the proposed restructuring could eliminate up to 1,155 scientific positions and shutter key research facilities.
The Office of Research and Development plays a critical role in detecting pollutants, assessing toxic risks, and informing regulations with scientific research.
Orme-Zavaleta argues that gutting this office would set back scientific progress for decades, leaving emerging threats like PFAS and nanoplastics unchecked.

Key quote:

"It took decades to build it. It will take decades to rebuild it."

— Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former principal deputy assistant administrator, EPA Office of Research and Development

Why this matters:

The EPA relies on scientific research to set regulations that protect public health and the environment. Proposed budget cuts to its research division could weaken the agency’s ability to detect and respond to environmental hazards, from industrial chemicals to climate-related disasters. Without independent studies, regulations may become more reactive than preventive, potentially exposing communities to unregulated pollutants and slowing responses to crises like chemical spills and harmful algal blooms.

Supporters of the cuts argue that regulatory decisions should lean more on industry-led research or state-level initiatives, while critics warn that weakening federal research could lead to regulatory capture, where industries influence policies in their favor. With climate-related disasters on the rise and concerns over water and air quality persisting, experts caution that reducing the EPA’s scientific capacity could leave the country less prepared to address emerging environmental threats.

insideclimatenews.org

EPA’s research office faces deep cuts, sparking alarm over environmental protections

Scientists move forward with climate assessment work despite federal dismissals

Climate disaster survivors form nationwide movement to push for climate action and disaster reform

How federal neglect fuels wildfire crises on tribal lands

Soil tests reveal toxic metals lingering in L.A. burn zones after government cleanup

Alaska villages face soaring energy costs as GOP debate threatens clean energy tax credits

Louisiana coastal restoration project faces new turmoil over hidden environmental report

Satellites burning up in Earth’s atmosphere could worsen climate change and ozone depletion

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.