EPA faces legal pushback over canceled climate grants
A federal judge sharply criticized the Environmental Protection Agency for canceling $20 billion in climate grants without providing evidence of misconduct, but she did not indicate whether she would intervene immediately.
Alex Guillén reports for POLITICO.
In short:
- EPA administrator Lee Zeldin canceled Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants, including $7 billion for Climate United Fund, prompting lawsuits from affected groups.
- Judge Tanya Chutkan questioned whether the agency followed proper procedures, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the cancellations.
- Climate United warned that without access to funds, it would begin furloughing workers and defaulting on commitments by the end of the week.
Key quote:
"I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up."
— Judge Tanya Chutkan, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Why this matters:
The canceled grants were designed to fund clean energy projects and emissions reductions, key components of federal Biden-era climate policy. The legal battle underscores the broader fight over environmental funding under the Trump administration, which has sought to roll back climate initiatives.
If the courts uphold the cancellations, it could set a precedent that makes it easier for current and future administrations to undo previously approved climate policies. That could introduce new uncertainty into the clean energy sector, where businesses and investors rely on government incentives and funding to drive development. It could also complicate efforts to meet emissions reduction targets, both at the national level and for individual states that have set ambitious climate goals of their own.
Read more: EPA cancels $20 billion in climate grants amid legal battle
