Dr. David Keith’s proposal to cool Earth sparks debate

David Keith suggests releasing sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to lower global temperatures, igniting both interest and concern over the potential risks and benefits of geoengineering.

David Gelles reports for The New York Times.

In short:

David Keith proposes using sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere to reduce global warming, drawing parallels to the cooling effect of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption.
Critics fear geoengineering could lead to unforeseen global consequences, such as altered weather patterns and health risks, and divert attention from reducing fossil fuel use.
Keith acknowledges the risks but emphasizes the potential to save millions of lives by mitigating heat-related deaths.

Key quote:

“There are unintended consequences of powerful technologies like these, and we have no idea what they will be.”

— David Suzuki, Canadian environmentalist

Why this matters:

Geoengineering is increasingly discussed as a potential tool against climate change, but its deployment poses ethical and environmental challenges. While it might offer a temporary solution to rising temperatures, it may also introduce new risks and delay essential efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

www.nytimes.com

Dr. David Keith’s proposal to cool Earth sparks debate

Roseland residents suffer as EPA delays cleanup

The EV tax credit is ending. How could that affect the US car market?

Kentucky adds clean energy jobs but Trump policies threaten continued growth

As hurricanes stir up coastal waters, North Carolina homes collapse into the sea

E-bikes can cut carbon, congestion, costs — if cities take them seriously

Despite the Trump administration’s best efforts to suppress it, climate science is alive and well online

The National Flood Insurance Program is losing billions

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.