
21 February 2024
Agents of Change: 2022-2023 Cohort
Read the ideas and solutions from our fourth cohort.
Read the ideas and solutions from our fourth cohort.
Fossil fuel companies poured nearly $100 million into Donald Trump’s 2024 re-election campaign while lobbying against climate regulations, prompting concerns about industry influence and stalled congressional investigations.
In short:
Key quote:
"The fossil fuel industry is running perhaps the biggest campaign of disinformation and political interference in American history and they’re backing it up with immense amounts of political spending."
— Sheldon Whitehouse, U.S. Democratic senator from Rhode Island
Why this matters:
Fossil fuel companies have long influenced American politics, but their record-breaking spending in the 2024 election underscores their role in shaping climate policy. With Republicans in control of Congress, oversight of industry lobbying and disinformation campaigns is unlikely. Meanwhile, Trump’s pro-oil agenda threatens environmental regulations and climate action. As lawsuits against oil giants progress, state-level investigations may become the last avenue for uncovering the industry's internal strategies.
Learn more: US oil and gas sector pours big money into GOP politics
Less than a month after sidelining its entire environmental justice workforce, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is bringing back dozens of employees amid pressure from the White House and legal obligations.
In short:
Key quote:
“These leaves were conducted indiscriminately and without any consideration of statutory requirements, or of the effect the firings would have on Americans.”
— Kyla Bennett, director of science policy at Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility
Why this matters:
While the reinstatement is a win for those fighting to keep environmental justice on the agenda, it also raises an uncomfortable question: If these roles were so essential that the EPA had to bring them back, why were they slashed in the first place?
Read more: America, this is what environmental justice is — and what we all stand to lose.
The White House is stripping the Council on Environmental Quality of its authority to oversee the National Environmental Policy Act, leaving federal agencies to develop their own rules for evaluating infrastructure projects.
In short:
Key quote:
“It’s chaos. No business would run this way.”
— Deborah Sivas, director of the environmental law clinic at Stanford University
Why this matters:
NEPA has been central to U.S. environmental policy for decades, ensuring that projects account for their ecological impact. Weakening federal oversight risks inconsistent enforcement, legal battles, and delays. The policy shift also raises concerns about diminished public input, as NEPA has historically provided communities with a voice in decisions that could affect their health and local environment. Without rigorous environmental reviews, opponents fear that projects with serious ecological consequences could move forward unchecked, potentially undermining the very goal of efficient development.
Learn more: Trump administration seeks to dismantle key environmental law
The Trump administration is considering closing key facilities of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), a move that scientists and industry groups warn could weaken weather forecasting, disrupt businesses, and endanger public safety.
In short:
Key quote:
“This will literally bankrupt the U.S.”
— Brad Panovich, chief meteorologist at WCNC-TV
Why this matters:
A potential reduction in NOAA’s capabilities — whether through budget cuts, facility closures, or staffing shortages — could have widespread consequences. Weather forecasting relies on a network of sensors, buoys, and satellites, all feeding into complex models that help predict storms days or even weeks in advance. Less funding for NOAA means fewer data points, less accurate predictions, and greater uncertainty for decision-makers.
The timing is particularly concerning. Climate change is intensifying hurricanes, wildfires, and heat waves, making precise forecasting more crucial than ever. Emergency managers depend on NOAA data to determine when to issue evacuation orders, farmers use it to decide when to plant and harvest crops, and insurers set policy rates based on weather risk assessments. A less effective NOAA could mean more surprises — and more costly disasters.
Read more: Standing up for science: Around the world, scientists protest Trump threats to their work
Butterfly numbers in the contiguous United States have declined by 22% over the past two decades, with habitat loss, climate change, and pesticide use driving the drop, according to new research.
Catrin Einhorn and Harry Stevens report for The New York Times.
In short:
Key quote:
“The loss that we’re seeing over such a short time is really alarming. Unless we change things, we’re in for trouble.”
— Elise Zipkin, quantitative ecologist at Michigan State University and one of the authors of the study
Why this matters:
Butterflies are essential pollinators and serve as indicators of ecosystem health. Their decline signals broader environmental instability affecting plants, birds, and other wildlife. Pesticides and habitat destruction are reducing insect populations worldwide, with cascading effects up the food chain. While some species are shifting their ranges to adapt to climate change, others are disappearing altogether. Without intervention, these losses could further disrupt ecosystems and food production.
The Trump administration is ramping up support for U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, with top officials promoting a major expansion project in southeast Louisiana despite environmental concerns.
In short:
Key quote:
“Today is the celebration of the fact that America is back in business building export facilities to help Americans and help our allies.”
— Doug Burgum, U.S. Interior Secretary
Why this matters:
The expansion of LNG exports fuels a long-standing debate between energy independence and environmental impact. Proponents argue it strengthens U.S. influence in global energy markets, particularly in supplying allies in Europe and Asia. Critics warn that increased LNG production leads to more greenhouse gas emissions and industrial pollution, with local communities in Louisiana already reporting regulatory violations and safety concerns.
The Trump administration’s efforts to roll back restrictions imposed during the Biden years mark a broader shift in energy policy, prioritizing fossil fuel development over emissions reduction goals. While industry leaders welcome the regulatory changes, climate advocates say they could undermine U.S. commitments to curb greenhouse gas emissions, complicating international climate negotiations and domestic policy efforts aimed at addressing the effects of climate change.
Related:
Governments worldwide are delaying environmental policies due to fear of billion-dollar lawsuits from fossil fuel companies under the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system.
Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield report for The Guardian.
In short:
Key quote:
“My impression from working closely with governments is that ISDS is now increasingly on their radar, that is it’s increasingly an issue for them to consider: whether implementing a particular policy might give rise to claims.”
— Toby Landau, arbitration lawyer
Why this matters:
The ISDS system is shaping global climate policy, often in favor of fossil fuel companies. Countries that attempt to phase out oil, gas, and coal face the threat of costly legal battles, leading to weaker or delayed environmental regulations. Developing nations, in particular, struggle with the financial burden of these lawsuits, sometimes amounting to a significant portion of their GDP. As the climate crisis accelerates, the legal power of corporations to challenge green policies raises concerns about whether governments can effectively transition to renewable energy without facing financial ruin.
Read more: Fossil fuel company’s lawsuit against Greenpeace heads to trial in North Dakota
“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.
We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.
Responses to the new rules have been mixed, and environmental advocates worry that Trump could undermine them.
Prisons, jails and detention centers are placed in locations where environmental hazards such as toxic landfills, floods and extreme heat are the norm.
The leadership team talks about what they’ve learned — and what lies ahead.
Top polluters are benefiting the most from tax breaks.