CNX’s controversial fracking study sparks debate in Pennsylvania
CNX Resources claims their fracking operations pose no public health risks based on a self-funded study, but climate activists argue the findings contradict peer-reviewed science and past reports of harm to nearby residents.
Audrey Carleton reports for Capital & Main.
In short:
- CNX Resources, a major Pennsylvania gas producer, released a study downplaying health risks from fracking, sparking criticism from environmentalists.
- The study comes as CNX seeks federal funding for a hydrogen project, but opponents argue it overlooks proven health hazards from fracking, such as polluted air and water.
- Activists and researchers question the study’s scientific rigor, arguing that its findings are not supported by long-term or comprehensive data.
Key quote:
"CNX’s radically dishonest and irresponsible fracking report fails the fundamental tests of scientific integrity."
— Alex Bomstein, executive director of Clean Air Council
Why this matters:
Fracking has long been linked to serious health risks, particularly in communities near drilling sites. As CNX pushes to secure public funds, critics fear that flawed data may lead to environmental and public health sacrifices for the sake of industry profits.
Related EHN coverage:
- A Pennsylvania fracking company with more than 2,000 environmental violations was selected for federal environmental justice funding
- Fracking chemicals “imbalance” the immune system
- Fractured: The body burden of living near fracking
- Fractured: Harmful chemicals and unknowns haunt Pennsylvanians surrounded by fracking
