Burnt building with charred debris in the foreground.

California considers taxing energy companies to fund climate disaster costs

As wildfires continue to rage in Los Angeles, advocates are urging California to adopt a "climate superfund" law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay for climate-related damages, following similar laws in New York and Vermont.

Karen Zraick reports for The New York Times.

In short:

New York and Vermont passed "climate superfund" laws requiring energy companies to pay for climate-related damages, but these laws face legal challenges from the oil industry.
California may revisit a similar bill, as taxpayers currently bear the full cost of wildfires and other climate disasters.
These laws rely on "attribution science," which connects climate damages to specific companies’ emissions.

Key quote:

“Taxpayers are shouldering 100 percent of the burden of climate-fueled disasters.”

— Kassie Siegel, director of the Climate Law Institute at the Center for Biological Diversity

Why this matters:

Rising climate costs from disasters like wildfires are straining public resources. Shifting financial responsibility to fossil fuel companies could relieve taxpayers and create incentives to reduce emissions. Legal battles will determine whether these efforts succeed.

www.nytimes.com

California considers taxing energy companies to fund climate disaster costs

Trump administration redirects clean energy funds in defiance of Congress

Burning fossil fuels linked to 1,500 deaths in Europe’s latest heat wave

Far-right group takes lead in EU climate talks, raising doubts over 2040 emissions goal

Solar is no longer alternative energy—it's the new default

Shanxi province faces difficult path away from coal as China pushes clean energy

Texas growth and lax rules put more homes in harm’s way from flood disasters

Trump administration moves to shut down critical storm research lab in Oklahoma

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.