Biden's temporary halt on gas exports sparks scientific debate

President Biden's decision to limit liquefied natural gas exports has ignited a scientific and political debate over its environmental impact, with new research challenging the fuel's clean image.

Joel Kirkland reports for POLITICO.

In short:

New studies suggest natural gas contributes more to global warming than previously believed, contradicting its reputation as a cleaner alternative to coal.
The White House has paused liquid natural gas (LNG) export permits to assess their climate change impact, sparking criticism from industry groups and Republicans.
A debate is underway about the life-cycle emissions of natural gas, including methane leakage during production and transportation.

Key quote:

"We’re the world’s largest producer of natural gas... It’s totally the wrong trajectory."

— Robert Howarth, professor, Cornell University

Why this matters:

This issue directly impacts global climate change policies and the U.S.'s energy strategy. Understanding the true environmental cost of natural gas is vital for informed policy decisions, especially in the context of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Op-Ed: President Biden continues to deploy conventional tactics against the highly unconventional threat of climate change.

www.politico.com

Biden's temporary halt on gas exports sparks scientific debate

How the U.S. public lost its say on environmental policy

Energy firms try to squeeze more power out of old nuclear plants

In Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, advocates rally for tougher rules on fracking

Abandoned oil and gas wells leave PA with a costly problem

New Zealand’s climate ‘entering uncharted territory’ as greenhouse gases hit record highs

Solar power is helping the Global South skip fossil fuels

Utah needs a ‘Code Red’ policy to protect the homeless from extreme heat, report says

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.